Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation.
Identifieur interne : 002A47 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002A46; suivant : 002A48Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation.
Auteurs : T. Compernolle [Belgique] ; S. Van Passel ; N. Weyens ; J. Vangronsveld ; L. Lebbe ; T. ThewysSource :
- International journal of phytoremediation [ 1522-6514 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH), Belgique (MeSH), Déchets industriels (MeSH), Dépollution biologique de l'environnement (MeSH), Facteurs temps (MeSH), Modèles biologiques (MeSH), Mouvements de l'eau (MeSH), Nappe phréatique (composition chimique), Polluants chimiques de l'eau (MeSH), Populus (MeSH), Simulation numérique (MeSH), Élimination des déchets liquides (méthodes), Élimination des déchets liquides (économie).
- MESH :
- composition chimique : Nappe phréatique.
- méthodes : Élimination des déchets liquides.
- économie : Élimination des déchets liquides.
- Analyse coût-bénéfice, Belgique, Déchets industriels, Dépollution biologique de l'environnement, Facteurs temps, Modèles biologiques, Mouvements de l'eau, Polluants chimiques de l'eau, Populus, Simulation numérique.
- Wicri :
- geographic : Belgique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Belgium (MeSH), Biodegradation, Environmental (MeSH), Computer Simulation (MeSH), Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH), Groundwater (chemistry), Industrial Waste (MeSH), Models, Biological (MeSH), Populus (MeSH), Time Factors (MeSH), Waste Disposal, Fluid (economics), Waste Disposal, Fluid (methods), Water Movements (MeSH), Water Pollutants, Chemical (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chemical : Industrial Waste, Water Pollutants, Chemical.
- geographic : Belgium.
- chemistry : Groundwater.
- economics : Waste Disposal, Fluid.
- methods : Waste Disposal, Fluid.
- Biodegradation, Environmental, Computer Simulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Models, Biological, Populus, Time Factors, Water Movements.
Abstract
In 1999, phytoremediation was applied at the site of a Belgian car factory to contain two BTEX plumes. This case study evaluates the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation compared to other remediation options, applying a tailored approach for economic evaluation. Generally, when phytoremediation is addressed as being cost effective, the cost effectiveness is only determined on an average basis. This study however, demonstrates that an incremental analysis may provide a more nuanced conclusion. When the cost effectiveness is calculated on an average basis, in this particular case, the no containment strategy (natural attenuation) has the lowest cost per unit mass removed and hence, should be preferred. However, when the cost effectiveness is determined incrementally, no containment should only be preferred if the value of removing an extra gram of contaminant mass is lower than 320 euros. Otherwise, a permeable reactive barrier should be adopted. A similar analysis is provided for the effect determined on the basis of remediation time. Phytoremediation is preferred compared to 'no containment' if reaching the objective one year earlier is worth 7 000 euros.
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2011.628879
PubMed: 22908651
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation.</title><author><name sortKey="Compernolle, T" sort="Compernolle, T" uniqKey="Compernolle T" first="T" last="Compernolle">T. Compernolle</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium. tine.compernolle@uhasselt.be</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Diepenbeek</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Passel, S" sort="Van Passel, S" uniqKey="Van Passel S" first="S" last="Van Passel">S. Van Passel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weyens, N" sort="Weyens, N" uniqKey="Weyens N" first="N" last="Weyens">N. Weyens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vangronsveld, J" sort="Vangronsveld, J" uniqKey="Vangronsveld J" first="J" last="Vangronsveld">J. Vangronsveld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lebbe, L" sort="Lebbe, L" uniqKey="Lebbe L" first="L" last="Lebbe">L. Lebbe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thewys, T" sort="Thewys, T" uniqKey="Thewys T" first="T" last="Thewys">T. Thewys</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22908651</idno><idno type="pmid">22908651</idno><idno type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2011.628879</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002921</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002921</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002921</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002921</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002921</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation.</title><author><name sortKey="Compernolle, T" sort="Compernolle, T" uniqKey="Compernolle T" first="T" last="Compernolle">T. Compernolle</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium. tine.compernolle@uhasselt.be</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Diepenbeek</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Passel, S" sort="Van Passel, S" uniqKey="Van Passel S" first="S" last="Van Passel">S. Van Passel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weyens, N" sort="Weyens, N" uniqKey="Weyens N" first="N" last="Weyens">N. Weyens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vangronsveld, J" sort="Vangronsveld, J" uniqKey="Vangronsveld J" first="J" last="Vangronsveld">J. Vangronsveld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lebbe, L" sort="Lebbe, L" uniqKey="Lebbe L" first="L" last="Lebbe">L. Lebbe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thewys, T" sort="Thewys, T" uniqKey="Thewys T" first="T" last="Thewys">T. Thewys</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of phytoremediation</title><idno type="ISSN">1522-6514</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Belgium (MeSH)</term><term>Biodegradation, Environmental (MeSH)</term><term>Computer Simulation (MeSH)</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>Groundwater (chemistry)</term><term>Industrial Waste (MeSH)</term><term>Models, Biological (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (MeSH)</term><term>Time Factors (MeSH)</term><term>Waste Disposal, Fluid (economics)</term><term>Waste Disposal, Fluid (methods)</term><term>Water Movements (MeSH)</term><term>Water Pollutants, Chemical (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH)</term><term>Belgique (MeSH)</term><term>Déchets industriels (MeSH)</term><term>Dépollution biologique de l'environnement (MeSH)</term><term>Facteurs temps (MeSH)</term><term>Modèles biologiques (MeSH)</term><term>Mouvements de l'eau (MeSH)</term><term>Nappe phréatique (composition chimique)</term><term>Polluants chimiques de l'eau (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (MeSH)</term><term>Simulation numérique (MeSH)</term><term>Élimination des déchets liquides (méthodes)</term><term>Élimination des déchets liquides (économie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Industrial Waste</term><term>Water Pollutants, Chemical</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Belgium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Groundwater</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="composition chimique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Nappe phréatique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Waste Disposal, Fluid</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Waste Disposal, Fluid</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Élimination des déchets liquides</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Élimination des déchets liquides</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodegradation, Environmental</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term><term>Models, Biological</term><term>Populus</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Water Movements</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice</term><term>Belgique</term><term>Déchets industriels</term><term>Dépollution biologique de l'environnement</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Modèles biologiques</term><term>Mouvements de l'eau</term><term>Polluants chimiques de l'eau</term><term>Populus</term><term>Simulation numérique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Belgique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In 1999, phytoremediation was applied at the site of a Belgian car factory to contain two BTEX plumes. This case study evaluates the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation compared to other remediation options, applying a tailored approach for economic evaluation. Generally, when phytoremediation is addressed as being cost effective, the cost effectiveness is only determined on an average basis. This study however, demonstrates that an incremental analysis may provide a more nuanced conclusion. When the cost effectiveness is calculated on an average basis, in this particular case, the no containment strategy (natural attenuation) has the lowest cost per unit mass removed and hence, should be preferred. However, when the cost effectiveness is determined incrementally, no containment should only be preferred if the value of removing an extra gram of contaminant mass is lower than 320 euros. Otherwise, a permeable reactive barrier should be adopted. A similar analysis is provided for the effect determined on the basis of remediation time. Phytoremediation is preferred compared to 'no containment' if reaching the objective one year earlier is worth 7 000 euros.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22908651</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>22</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1522-6514</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>14</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of phytoremediation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Phytoremediation</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>861-77</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>In 1999, phytoremediation was applied at the site of a Belgian car factory to contain two BTEX plumes. This case study evaluates the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation compared to other remediation options, applying a tailored approach for economic evaluation. Generally, when phytoremediation is addressed as being cost effective, the cost effectiveness is only determined on an average basis. This study however, demonstrates that an incremental analysis may provide a more nuanced conclusion. When the cost effectiveness is calculated on an average basis, in this particular case, the no containment strategy (natural attenuation) has the lowest cost per unit mass removed and hence, should be preferred. However, when the cost effectiveness is determined incrementally, no containment should only be preferred if the value of removing an extra gram of contaminant mass is lower than 320 euros. Otherwise, a permeable reactive barrier should be adopted. A similar analysis is provided for the effect determined on the basis of remediation time. Phytoremediation is preferred compared to 'no containment' if reaching the objective one year earlier is worth 7 000 euros.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Compernolle</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium. tine.compernolle@uhasselt.be</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Van Passel</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weyens</LastName><ForeName>N</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vangronsveld</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lebbe</LastName><ForeName>L</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Thewys</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Phytoremediation</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101136878</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1522-6514</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007220">Industrial Waste</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014874">Water Pollutants, Chemical</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001530" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Belgium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001673" MajorTopicYN="Y">Biodegradation, Environmental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003198" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D060587" MajorTopicYN="N">Groundwater</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007220" MajorTopicYN="N">Industrial Waste</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008954" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Biological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="Y">Populus</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014865" MajorTopicYN="N">Waste Disposal, Fluid</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014872" MajorTopicYN="N">Water Movements</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014874" MajorTopicYN="N">Water Pollutants, Chemical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22908651</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1080/15226514.2011.628879</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Lebbe, L" sort="Lebbe, L" uniqKey="Lebbe L" first="L" last="Lebbe">L. Lebbe</name><name sortKey="Thewys, T" sort="Thewys, T" uniqKey="Thewys T" first="T" last="Thewys">T. Thewys</name><name sortKey="Van Passel, S" sort="Van Passel, S" uniqKey="Van Passel S" first="S" last="Van Passel">S. Van Passel</name><name sortKey="Vangronsveld, J" sort="Vangronsveld, J" uniqKey="Vangronsveld J" first="J" last="Vangronsveld">J. Vangronsveld</name><name sortKey="Weyens, N" sort="Weyens, N" uniqKey="Weyens N" first="N" last="Weyens">N. Weyens</name></noCountry><country name="Belgique"><noRegion><name sortKey="Compernolle, T" sort="Compernolle, T" uniqKey="Compernolle T" first="T" last="Compernolle">T. Compernolle</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002A47 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002A47 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22908651
|texte= Groundwater remediation and the cost effectiveness of phytoremediation.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22908651" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |